The Latest Thing in Hegemony
I am starting to see opinions that the US should extend its hegemony in the wake of the great success of regime change in Iraq.
I won't go to whether Iraq has been a success (tell me when the jury's back).
But the concept of regime change is actually not new.
All that has changed since the collapse of the Soviet Union is that what used to be done covertly is now done overtly.
What has the success of past regime change been? On the whole, pretty pathetic. With the excuse of opposing Communism, democratically elected governments were overthrown and replaced by vicious dictatorships. Of course, things have changed now: there is no evil empire to oppose so maybe the New Regime Change will be more benign. But ask the people of Angola, Congo, Southeast Asia and countless other countries and regions whether regime change US-style is such a popular option.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments welcome. Advertising and totally unrelated material will be deleted. Anonymous comments accepted but not accorded the same credibility as signed comments. If you make factual assertions please provide references. Comments on articles more than 10 days old are moderated to catch spam.